« Older Home
Loading Newer »

Indian River State College: High Regard for Higher Ed?

“BIOLOGY ADJUNCTS NEEDED BY IRSC (formerly IRCC)

Biology adjuncts–especially to teach General Biology and Microbiology at our Okeechobee campus, however, we can use more adjuncts at our other campuses starting for the Fall semester. 

 In order to lecture at the college, minimum requirements are a Master’s degree with 18 graduate hours in the subject you are teaching. Prior teaching experience would be nice, but is not required.  The department will provide everthing you need (text book, lecture materials, example tests, etc).

 Pay runs according to the degree (Master’s, Ph.D) you have but ballpark is $500/credit hour (lecture classes are 3 credits) so it is approx. $1500 per course.  The course runs 15 weeks in the Fall & Spring and 6 weeks in the Summer semesters.  Classes meet for 2 1/2 hours per week.  Day classes generally meet twice a week for 1 and 1/4 hours, while night classes meet one day a week for 2 1/2 hours (usually 5:30 to 8 p.m.).”

 Amazing. As a former college biology prof with decades of teaching experience (at so-called “Tier 1” private and state institutions) and a Ph.D., here’s how I look at this opportunity.

At the simplest level, for daytime classes there are 30 lectures for $1,500 or $50 per lecture. I live north of Vero Beach. Let’s say I’m teaching at the Main Campus in Fort Pierce, which is a roundtrip of about 60 miles. With gas costs around $4.00 per gallon, and my vehicle getting about 20 miles per gallon, it will cost me approximately $30 just in gas to get to my lecture. This ignores other real vehicle costs. So, now I’m making $20 per 1.25 hour lecture (before taxes). Sound good? Let’s take a closer look.

 For that 1.25 hour lecture, I will need to prepare between 2 – 3 hours. Let’s say I’m conscientious, and it’s 3 hours prep time for every lecture. Viewed from the perspective of hourly wages, then, for the $1,500 I will work: 37.5 hours contact time + 90 hours prep time = 127.5 hours, or about $11.75 per hour. Not bad? Wait, I forgot to include office hours (not mentioned, but students will require them), exam prep and grading, assignment prep and grading, and course paperwork. My conservative estimate of this additional time would be about 2 hours per week, or another 30 work hours, for a total of 157.5 hours. Now, I’m looking at $9.50 per hour, before taxes. 

 But wait, I forgot the 2 hours of travel time to get to each lecture and then return home. That’s another 60 hours of my time, but I know I’ll never get paid for these, so forget them (but, if I did include this time my hourly would hover around $6.90). And, I have to remember the gas costs… If I return to my original calculation of $20 per 1.25 hour lecture, and add only the 3 hours of prep time, my pay becomes $20/4.25 or $4.70 per hour.

 So, what’s the bottom line? Get a Ph.D. so you too can aspire to earn up to $4.70 per hour at Indian River State College? Are they serious? Who would take this job, I wonder? 

Sea walls do more harm than good

Glynn’s Folly, as the Summerplace Sea Wall Atrocity is commonly called, has already cost the public a fortune in legal fees, ongoing sand pumping, damages to adjacent property, and lost recreation value.

Additional actual costs must include the catastrophic erosional impacts on the adjacent public Wabasso Beach, immediately down-current from Summerplace. Lawsuits from Disney’s Vero Beach Resort loom as a potential future liability of the sea wall. And, then, there are the environmental impacts…

Recently the Vero Beach Press-Journal noted that the beach in front of Glynn’s sea wall is non-existent at high tide, having been washed away because of inevitable changes in beach dynamics resulting from the armoring.

All Summerplace residents have deeded beach access, and the right to use this beach. Now, their beach has been destroyed by the actions of a few, selfish property owners. These folks live in an unsustainable location: on top of the primary dune in a State-designated area of a critically eroding shoreline. How long will we have to wait for a rational, science-based solution to the current mess we call our County’s beach management policy?

Fighting for our National Wildlife Refuges

It all began with one man and one boat protecting pelicans on a tiny five-acre island in Florida. Now, Pelican Island, the birthplace of our National Wildlife Refuge System, is threatened once again.

For generations, residents of Indian River County have taken pride in knowing Pelican Island was a very special place. However, with this special gift comes the responsibility to stand up and fight to protect Pelican Island and its wildlife heritage.

For generations, residents of Indian River County have shouldered this responsibility. Beginning with Paul Kroegel, continuing through Joe Michael, Maggie Bowman, and others, they stepped up to fight for Pelican Island. Now, it’s our turn.

Today’s threats are real. Yet our ability to protect Pelican Island is being eroded by actions far away in Washington. In the end this place is ours to protect. And protecting it is a sacred trust we keep for the future.

This is about more than just a special place – the land, water, and wildlife – it’s about who we are. I know you will join with us in urging our elected representatives and officials in Washington to restore full funding for our national wildlife refuges.

Today, Pelican Island National Wildlife Refuge is 5,000 acres larger and over a hundred years older, and its protection needs more than just one man and one boat. We must fight for a renewed commitment to our refuges, one that will benefit wildlife and our community for the next one hundred years.

Reflection on loss

The profound loss death of loved ones brings leads us to wonder about the world. For many, these moments rekindle religious beliefs, and are sensed as a chance to draw strength from spiritual sources. For others, loss of loved ones reminds us that our small flame of reason is a delicate lamp illuminating the vast mystery of the universe. For all, loss stirs love that binds us as one.

It is better to light one candle than to curse the darkness. - Adage

Conservation by development?

Florida’s population and development are projected to double in the next fifty years. 1000 Friends of Florida’s new Florida 2060 report raises the question of what Florida will look like when the population goes from today’s sprawling 18 million or so residents, to 36 million in 2060?

In our central Florida region growth will be “explosive,” and vitually all natural landscapes will be fragmented or consumed by urbanization. It’s likely that there won’t be public monies available to buy enough conservation lands to sustain native ecosystems, and preserve our quality of life.
Mary Dawson, founder of the new Sustaining Community Lands, Inc. in Martin County, came up to Vero Beach today to share a story about an alternative model for conserving land as we develop. Building on the work of the Sonoran Insitute of Tucson, and the Liberty Prairie Conservancy of Lake County, Illinois, she told our Conservation and Rural Lands Group about the Community Land Conservancy (CLC) Model. Also called Community Stewardship Organizations (CSOs), these nonprofits are established when a developer is trying to set aside significant environmental land as part of the development process.

Lands within the development are set aside for conservation or open space, and the developer requires a transfer fee to be paid for the benefit of the CSO each time a home is sold in the development. The funds from transfer fees and other sources available to nonprofits (grants, memberships, donations, etc.) are used to hire professional scientists and land managers to maintain and/or restore the conservation land, and to conduct public outreach programs to promote conservation in the community. Such projects work best if the developments are situated within a larger landscape containing natural resources worthy of protection.
Conservation is directly paid for by development in this approach, and stewardship is local and nongovernmental. We welcome Mary’s vision, and hope that it offers one more tool in the toolkit we’ll need to build our future.